Quite a few Indian cricket followers would think about the title of this posting a blasphemous just one. Specially as Mumbai Indians led by cricket ‘god’ Sachin Tendulkar were in the last versus Dhoni’s Chennai Super Kings.
Primarily as Mumbai Indians narrowly mised out on the semi-finals in the very first two editions of the event, and possessing entered the finals, you would not assume them to toss it away.
Substantially right after the curtains went down on the newest IPL circus, the doubts about the final final result of the match persist.
As a substitute of finding emotionally upset about the full concept, I would recommend Indian cricket fans to look at the info, dispassionately, and get there at a rational summary.
Actuality 1: Mumbai Indians had been without having doubt the most achieved group in IPL three, going into the ultimate. Barring their 1st match against Rajasthan Royals that was nearly received one-handedly by Yusuf Pathan for the Jaipur staff led by Shane Warne, all the other victories were being convincing kinds, with Sachin leading his team by illustration. He obtained able support from Dhawan, Rayudu, Tiwari, Bravo and Pollard in batting, although Malinga and Zaheer led the bowling, with help from Harbhajan.
Truth two: Till the very last more than of their last spherical-robin match, Chennai Tremendous Kings seemed not likely to make it to the semi-remaining. In point, during the event, they did not search as convincing as they did in IPL two and three.
Fact three: CSK’s pathetic batting display screen in the semi-final could not stop their entry into the closing, as a complicit DC team did even even worse.
Truth 4: Pursuing a chaseable target in the final, MI delayed Pollard’s arrival at the batting crease, sufficiently so as to insure a CSK acquire.
Some are possible to dispute my argument by pointing out that Sachin’s integrity is past dilemma. Also, repairing a match played by eleven-member groups is less difficult explained than finished. What is to avert find fixed matches ‘bought’ participant from squealing, once he is out of favour with the establishment?